Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elastic interface

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:39, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elastic interface

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was created by author while it was declined by Darylgolden (see User:Mfattoretto82/Elastic interface). Note: article has also been deleted on 2 March 2015. Sander.v.Ginkel ^{(Je suis Charlie)} 15:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – I was going to suggest a merge to Cycling pad, because most of the text was copied from there. But going with delete because it seems so clearly promotional. The company does get some mentions in the cycling press, e.g. [1] [2]. I suppose it wouldn't hurt that much to merge and mention a couple of brand names, viz. "Italian industry-leaders Elastic Interface and TMF — which, between them, provide chamois for 70% of the pro peloton" (at Cyclingtups.com). But once you start mentioning brand names it becomes a magnet for more brand names. Serves the same purpose to just say they're elastic, maybe with a link to one of the above articles. – Margin1522 (talk) 22:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.