Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor Gates-Stuart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:14, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eleanor Gates-Stuart

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF as an academic. This article was created by a

single purpose editor with the same surname. Gnews gives 4 hits but lacking indepth coverage of her as the subject. Almost an orphan article with Canberra the only article linking to this. LibStar (talk) 02:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nom said, doesn't seem to meet
WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete-per nom. Best Regards.---✨Lazy Maniik✨ 05:22, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 15:27, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Within 9 minutes the above user copy-pasted either "keep as above" or "delete per nom" on 10 AFDs, clearly disruptive editing in my opinion. I think the comment should be disregarded. The user is welcome to return to make actual comments. Geschichte (talk) 08:10, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Regrettably delete, due to inadequate independent coverage, and not meeting
WP:NPROF. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:44, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.