Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electric Loco Shed, Santragachi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – bradv🍁 03:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Electric Loco Shed, Santragachi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication why this would be a

Fram (talk) 16:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

Fram (talk) 16:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

Fram (talk) 16:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete Non-notable fancruft. There is no policy that says depots are inherently notable. The fact that the article only has the location "Santragahi" appended to make the title unique says a lot about it's notability. Jumpytoo Talk 19:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sources fail to establish notability Spiderone 19:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note The author appears to be doing a great job on the coverage of the Indian railway system. There is little argument that there is notability coverage for the individual shed, but as a small piece of a whole picture? Maybe a list-type article covering all sheds can be suggested to the author? I would hate to discourage the copious output on an important topic by the author by deleting parts of a large puzzle.--Concertmusic (talk) 22:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.