Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah Alejo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Geschichte (talk) 08:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elijah Alejo

Elijah Alejo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

teen actress with no really major role, no significant awards, and most of thereferences from non-independent sources DGG ( talk ) 00:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not notable. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 04:53, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails
  WP:NACTOR Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:10, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - Article fails GNG. I hope she gets there and receives a lot of national and international coverage but 11 years into her career you would expect more to be written. We must use common sense here. --
  Wolf 15:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: Article is cleaned up a bit. The sources there are definitely reliable. Sources 1 & 2 are non-trivial sources about her. Sources 3 to 12 describe/mention her roles in the respective shows she starred in. Source 13 states her nomination for a PMPC award. That said, the article is good enough to pass
  WP:NACTOR. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Meets
  WP:NACTOR per Astig's argument. The sources in the article are reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 01:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep per Superastig. Abrilando232 (talk) 09:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.