Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Amoaa (2nd nomination)

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) versacespaceleave a message! 11:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Elizabeth Amoaa

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Elizabeth Amoaa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the sourcing has improved quite a lot since last year and so this isn't quite a

WP:BIO is met here (we have her medical condition plus some recognition for her activism, but I couldn't even verify her education). Would like to hear more opinions, so sending to AFD. —Kusma (t·c) 19:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. —Kusma (t·c) 19:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. —Kusma (t·c) 19:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —Kusma (t·c) 19:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per Norm. JaredDaEconomist (talk) 14:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @JaredDaEconomist: I'm not certain that this should be deleted, so could you elaborate why you think this should be deleted? —Kusma (t·c) 17:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Why wouldn't Pulse Ghana, Ghana news, and Modern Ghana count as Reliable sources? Furius (talk) 18:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Furius: I'm assuming they are reliable in absence of evidence to the contrary (I'm hoping that editors with more knowledge of Ghana will comment). But being mentioned in reliable sources isn't the same as notability. —Kusma (t·c) 18:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    She is quite notable here in Ghana. Iamknightrae (talk) 16:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep From the sourcing, the subject fits the notability guideline and is considered a celebrity. Mellowdeaous (talk) 08:43, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This person is a very notable person here in Ghana. She has been on talk shows and national television with her mission. Iamknightrae (talk) 15:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per the references, the subject fits the notability guidelines. However, the article needs to be written better.Applehead1000 (talk) 19:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:38, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Elizabeth_Amoaa_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1023620645"