Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellen Cannon Reed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ellen Cannon Reed

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails

WP:BEFORE

I checked the usual suspects of online sourcing as well as my newspapers.com subscription - nothing. She has written many books, but, is not as "widely known" as promoted in this obituary-like article.

Thank you for assuming good faith on this nomination. Missvain (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Missvain (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet
WP:NAUTHOR --Whiteguru (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete there is no evidence of the works being significant even in the very specialized community. DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 28 December 2021 (UTC) r[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.