Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy Group
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 15:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Embassy Group
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Embassy Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is a Straightaway PR/Advertising
WP:PROMO. The creator of this page is particularly involved in creating and editing multiple non-notable wiki pages for this real estate company's properties. Few of them deleted via Afd route and few of them being nominated recently. Due diligence required at all cost.- Hatchens (talk) 12:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
]
- Pages under Afd Discussion- Embassy GolfLinks Business Park (2nd nomination) and Embassy TechVillage | Pages which has been deleted (via AfD route) - Embassy TechZone.-Hatchens (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 12:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 12:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete: I can find passing mentions in news stories, but no independent significant coverage that establishes its notability. MaysinFourty (talk) 15:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Undecided/Abstain: Changing my vote to abstain following the links provided below. Not Keep, because it still seems to me that their notability is linked to the number of projects. All those links are about their hotel projects/housing business or commercial/industrial parks (can those announcements be counted towards significant coverage for the group that proves its notability (apart from the fact that it has a ton of cash)? - I simply don't know). Does the fact that they have built many things (private, not major public buildings/monuments) make them notable for Wiki? I assumed not, but now I'm honestly confused, so will gladly retreat and let someone more experienced, and au fait with precedents, in this area pitch in. Regards, MaysinFourty (talk) 17:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Purely from a notability standpoint, this subject seems notable and meets notability requirements around a) independent coverage, b) coverage in reliable sources, and c) significant coverage. I did a quick search in some of the top financial newspapers in India, and have found sufficient material to say that this is clearly a notable topic and does not fail WP:GNG. Subset of my observations are below. The group seems to be a significantly large real estate group in India, with presence in the hospitality space, and has listed the real estate portions of its business as REIT in the Indian capital markets. There is for sure PR material out there, but, can be separated to see coverage for a publicly listed firm / gruop.
- However, there seems to be a good amount of quality issues with the page, and this should be tagged as such and feedback provided to improve those segments. Good luck.
Publication Coverage Sample Coverage Topic Link (Additional Reading) LiveMint Independent + Reliable + Significant [1][2][3] [4] The Economic Times Independent + Reliable + Significant [5][6][7] [8] The Hindu Business Line Independent + Reliable + Significant [9] [10]
- Ktin (talk) 17:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Ktin (talk · contribs), looks like a notably large real estate & property mgmt co. II | (t - c) 12:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Ktin's table. (Ktin: hope you don't mind: I linked the publications listed there). AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:08, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks AleatoryPonderings. Works perfect. Cheers. Ktin (talk) 18:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.