Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Axford

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Axford

Emily Axford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe Axford fails GNG by herself. The references used are all interviews and I cannot find in-depth information on her. Her husband may also fail as well. The criteria under

WP:ENTERTAINER requires multiple notable and significant roles and I believe she fails this as well. I suggest either deletion or redirect to Hot Date. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 16:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 16:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 16:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 16:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep she appears on Adam Ruins Everything, has a reasonably significant podcast, and wrote a reasonably well received book - along with her involvement with Hot Date. If it weren’t for the Adam Ruins Everything appearances and her podcast I would have !voted to delete however. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep definitely a notable person, multiple significant roles include Hot Date and Adam Ruins Everything. I seemed to find a fair few sources, so I don’t know where you were looking? Aussiespinnersfanpage (talk)
  • Keep: In my opinion, both
    WP:GNG
    are passed. Here are a few sources:
https://ew.com/tv/2017/09/15/hot-date-will-arnett-first-look/
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2017/8/7/18319378/chicago-clicked-for-couple-turning-hot-date-into-a-tv-series
https://deadline.com/2019/08/hot-date-season-2-premiere-date-for-pop-tvs-sketch-comedy-series-1202705506/
Dflaw4 (talk) 12:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.