Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enam Tugbefia

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 00:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enam Tugbefia

Enam Tugbefia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Enam Tugbefia

move warring
.

This article does not

a living person known for one event
, which can be covered in an article on the beauty contest, if the beauty contest is itself notable.

The article has been

reference-bombed
, and it should not be necessary to go through the sources to check on notability. However, reading the references shows that they are mostly about the 2019 beauty contest controversy.

Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant
1 Modern Ghana Reads like a press release No
2 3news A photo gallery about the beauty contest controversy No.
3 YEN.COM.GH A photo gallery about the beauty contest itself Maybe No
4 3news Same photo gallery as 2 No
5 Ghana Web Same press release as 1 No
6 Ghpage Another press release No
7 Voltaonlinegh About the beauty contest controversy No
8 Ytainment About the beauty contest controversy No
9 News AF Feed News An interview No
10 Pulse.com.gh Same interview as 9 No
11 Ghana News A news story about the beauty contest Yes No. Two sentences.
12 Ghana Celebrities A news story about the beauty contest Maybe No.
13 YEN.COM.GH Another news story about the beauty contest Maybe No
14 Ghpage Yet more coverage of the beauty contest No

This article is really about the beauty contest controversy. Either there should be an article about the beauty contest and the controversy, or there shouldn't; but the subject is clearly

BLP1E are all met. Either cover the controversy as a controversy, or don't cover it. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per nom; as above, references do not demonstrate notability. Eagleash (talk) 00:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per the exquisitely thorough presentation by the nom. Onel5969 TT me 02:07, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Hanging on a rope about one or two miles from Tenuous. Entirely non-notable. scope_creepTalk 13:42, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.