Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encouraging Sign

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Encouraging Sign

Encouraging Sign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I made this a redirect, but creator keeps reverting; fails

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Jewellery Quarter (album) and protect. The sources in the article are primarily about Jewellery Quarter (album) and the band. Encouraging Sign is not independently notable. I request protection due to the repeated edit-warring and undoing of the redirect by the creator and IPs. Cunard (talk) 07:16, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  07:53, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete - The article name is not commonly searched. Who knows if they are looking for this song, anyway? Its no where near as notable as many other songs which have no individual pages. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 08:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for lack of notability. The incoming links, when you remove deletion-related links, are from the band and the album - and that's all. So a redirect is somewhere between 6/5 and pick'em. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 13:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Redirect per the practice that album tracks that don't chart as a single are non-notable unless there is a good reason otherwise. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.