Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epos Now

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Epos Now

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just an SME that fails ncorp Kaptain Kebab Heart (talk) 17:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
Talk to my owner:Online 18:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please explain the acronym SME, as a reader is completely lost to what that could be. Nate • (chatter) 23:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In this context, it refers to Small and medium-sized enterprises, which make up the overwhelming majority of UK companies Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. The article is subpar, but I think their POS system has enough coverage.
US News [1], TechRadar [2], Startups.co.uk [3]. ~ A412 ^talk! 06:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Here I found some of the sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 although they are not an in-depth coverage, yet these reviews, awards can't be neglected. Atighot (talk) 22:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as there are much more reliable sources than those cited in the current version of the page. The organization is pretty notable, per TechRadar and other media coverage. 扱. し. 侍. (talk) 15:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.