Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equalitarianism
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - redirected - SimonP 15:29, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Equalitarianism
Moved from Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English:
- Korean. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:26, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
- It's not an article, just a rant. It goes something like "Look UN! This is a world across the sea. Has technology advanced this far? I don't know..." Kappa12:35, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- It's not an article, just a rant. It goes something like "Look UN! This is a world across the sea. Has technology advanced this far? I don't know..."
<end moved text>
- Delete -- Jmabel | Talk 19:48, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Egalitarianism. -Sean Curtin 02:57, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Egalitarianism. Megan1967 05:45, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Technology didn't reach that far, the Fig Rolls of Doom ate it at the 23rd hour. This article is useless in any language. Hedley 03:31, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.