Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Himan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete (non-admin closure). Skomorokh 13:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Himan

Eric Himan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable artist, no assertion of artist notability. asenine ^t/_c 13:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep. A quick proquest search returns 27 news articles about the subject. Polevaults over
  WP:MUSIC. Article needs serious cleanup and insertion of those references, not deletion. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 13:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment: The article as it now stands is about an album, not the artist. If the album is notable (not sure if it is), the page needs to be moved to reflect the album name. If the article is about the artist, it needs to be rewritten.--Fabrictramp (talk) 16:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Normally, when I see this kind of thing, I fix it myself, but I don't know enough about the music industry to know how to go about writing an article for a musician. He seems notable enough, but the article needs to be about him and not the album. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 16:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Eric Himan's own website reveals some sources of third party reviews [1], and the NME has this, though I'm not sure if it counts for anything. sparkl_!sm ^hey! 17:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and tag for cleanup/expansion. Google news has tons of articles about this fellow. Chubbles (talk) 20:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.