Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erica Fontes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Erica Fontes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another porn-related BLP without any independent reliable sourcing or any legitimate assertion of notability. No independently sourced biographical content - virtually no biographical content at all. Only claim to notability is a short list of porn industry honors, which no longer count towards notability. PROD removed by SPA without article improvement. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per recently depreciated WP:PORNBIO criteria. Wm335td (talk) 18:25, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment She pops up on Google News all over the place in Portuguese publications. Not understanding Portuguese, it's hard to evaluate whether those sources are reliable to satisfy the GNG, even using Google Translate. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough reliable sourcing to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:28, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.