Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Armstrong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Drmies per CSD G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Erika Armstrong

Erika Armstrong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacking notoriety, author is subject of article (vanity / autobiography), lacking any credible sources, notices listed on page since 2016 requesting improvements KTurner40 (talk) 00:41, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
  Talk to my owner:Online 00:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Good find, doesn't seem to be notable, original creator seems to be subject or closely related to subject. Jerry (talk) 01:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:54, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Virtually unreferenced vanity piece; notability not established.
  Kablammo (talk) 13:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:54, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not a single allegation of
  almost certainly the work of the subject or her agent. Bearian (talk) 18:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Bearian, what you describe is a valid reason to delete speedily as promotion-only, and I have done so. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 18:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.