Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Rusch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ernest Rusch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notable only for being the recipient of a single second-level decoration. Generally, and backed up by

WP:SOLDIER, it takes two second-level decorations to establish notability failing any other reason for notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

SarahStierch (talk) 05:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete Not notable. One source that I saw isn't going to be enough to reach the notability guidelines so what happens if there is no notability? It gets deleted. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 01:22, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and per Ashbeckjonathan Nick-D (talk) 07:52, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.