Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ertaizi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ertaizi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A "there's no there there" placename: coords mark a point in the middle of field SW of a town with a different name. There is an Ertaizi geological formation but it's not the least bit clear what it's named after. GHits don't produce census info or anything else definitively indicating the presence of a town. Mangoe (talk) 17:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just because a place is now an open field doesn't mean it did not exist. It probably was subsequently destroyed or abandoned in WWII, or the Civil War or in the subsequent changes and turmoil of the Peoples Republic's history. Such places should be remembered, as a lesson in the fragility of all things human, if for no other reason. Asiaticus (talk) 18:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then source it. Mangoe (talk) 19:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: In current circumstances it fails
WP:V —usernamekiran(talk) 21:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.