Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esperanza Lázaro Valero

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete.

A7. Jujutacular (talk) 23:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Esperanza Lázaro Valero

Esperanza Lázaro Valero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails on

WP:GNG. Content of the article is written in promotional tone. Advert tag is placed on the article since August 2011. I don't see any encyclopedic value for the subject within the article. Google searches don't emit any favorable result for the subject. Hitro talk 18:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete G11. Entirely promotional, with no real content or sources. So tagged. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.