Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugenia Diordiychuk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 18:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eugenia Diordiychuk

Eugenia Diordiychuk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Glamour model who does not meet the GNG. Interviews or nkn-RS are not enough to source a BLP

Note: This discussion has been included in the

{talk} 15:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as cannot find any no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:54, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: does not meet the relevant notability guidelines. --K.e.coffman (talk) 20:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:21, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Britishfinance (talk) 12:03, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.