Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:44, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:ORG. WP:ORG says: "An organization is not notable merely because notable persons are associated with it. An organization is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." This page needs to be deleted. Topjur02 (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Topjur02 (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Topjur02 (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A pan-European organisation founded in 1956 that runs multiple large conferences, publishes three well-established academic journals with moderate to high impact factors (including Allergy which has an impact factor of 6.8 & ranks 4th of 27 journals in allergy & 25 of 158 journals in immunology [1]), and also issues guidelines that will be highly cited is so clearly notable that I'm beginning to question the good faith of these bulk nominations of clearly notable organisations at a time of year when many editors are offline. ETA I also note that the nominator essentially blanked the article after nominating it for AfD. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:31, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 01:41, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Thank you for pointing to relevant sources. It is now clear that it is notable enough. The article still includes mostly unsourced and unreferenced material, and material from the organization's website. This material will be removed or the page will be moved to a draft if someone does not improve the article soon. The article was nominated in good faith: it was totally unreferenced. No editors are offline these days. Nobody is offline in 2019 or 2020. Topjur02 (talk) 05:12, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If someone else can close this as withdrawn by nominator then I'll undertake to purge the article of some of the promotional tone. Espresso Addict (talk) 05:37, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.