Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Kurowski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No quorum here. causa sui (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Kurowski

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This musician/singer appears to be non-notable -- even if all claims in the article were backed by RS refs. Tagged for notability since October 2010. Epeefleche (talk) 23:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Would probably meet
ANYBIO if de:Das Hungertuch (Künstlerpreis) is notable - she apparently won it this year. However, I'm not convinced that it is. PWilkinson (talk) 23:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment I originally flagged this for Notability over a year ago, and AfD is a logical consequence of that. However I'm having mixed feelings about this one: with the Hungertuch prize and her recent and forthcoming books there is a bit more verifiable evidence around. AllyD (talk) 11:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 18:41, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:54, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.