Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn Taft (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:59, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Evelyn Taft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fluff, promotional piece with no real claim to notability. Dennis 2¢ 01:00, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just now noticed the previous AFD, which had the correct result but very little participation, so I don't mind a larger audience take a look for a week, if it lasts that long. Dennis 2¢ 01:02, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete With the exception of this bit, which is not so much about her as it is about the guy she replaced, I don't see any secondary sources discussing her, just lots of silly "Look who had a baby" bits from the station she works for. Cannolis (talk) 01:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The above observations are correct. There's very, very little info out there: her new employer being sued by the former job occupant (but Taft is not the focus of the article); having a baby. Nothing shows notability. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 23:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.