Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Event cascade

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 03:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Event cascade

Event cascade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced since its creation in 2002. Couldn't find sources using the term in the programming sense used here. Doesn't seem notable. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete what even is there to merge? the entire article is three sentences long, and doesn't have any sources. --Licks-rocks (talk) 13:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: These unsourced permastubs are not needed, if no one has updated the article in 20 yrs, I don't know what we're expected to do with it. Delete and it can be properly re-created if interested. I don't see usage of the term other than simple name drops or DICDEF. Oaktree b (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.