Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everyday Pakistan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 16:34, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Everyday Pakistan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A photoblog is not something that would be expected to have an article on English Wikipedia unless meet GNG. This one fails. Saqib (talk) 05:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 06:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 06:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 14:39, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 14:39, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

Everyday Pakistan was published in print in Gulf News and Indian Express. I searched online and found that since april its getting coverage by news organisations. Also added it after seeing that there are photoblogs up on wikipedia. I couldn’t find how to add a printed news paper link with references. And the references clearly indicate its verifiably and notability. I think it doesn’t come in deletion criteria. So keep — Preceding

XfD. [reply

]

delete - fails
WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:41, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to meet
WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.