Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolución (band)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:50, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Evolución (band)

Evolución (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1. There is no evidence of this band existing, the name is too common and returns no results relating to bands 2. Website no longer exists including a link to the band's album (Waybackmachine returns 0 results 3. Likely would have failed WP:Notability Theprussian (talk) 22:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have to use more robust search terms. I searched for <Evolución Costa Rica band> and got many results. Unfortunately most of them are no good; see my vote below. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did, it just may be what google returns in my geopgraphical area.Theprussian (talk) 13:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure there are more. I will drop these on the talk page of the band. Missvain (talk) 20:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep in view of the multiple reliable sources listed above including multiple articles in a national newspaper that show that the band pass
    WP:NMUSIC criteria 1 (only one criteria needed) and therefore deserve to be included, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The article needs a large rewrite, but they pass GNG from the sources I see listed above. –
    talk) 20:56, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.