Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fátima Custódia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fátima Custódia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign of any notability Kleuske (talk) 14:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: IMDb is not a reliable source, and both references refer to that database... No grounds for notability. — Javert2113 (Let's chat!) 15:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sign of notability at all. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 16:39, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as an article on a living person having no realible sources at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:30, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Grandson shows some notability, but, in this case, it must be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisempra (talk • contribs) 20:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.