Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Façade (film)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is some reluctance in the debate, which is understandable since the film involves some notable actors. However, the main issue is that there is no reliable sourcing for the film. The Rotten Tomatoes source is a placeholder entry stating that there are no reviews, while IMDb is listed as "generally unreliable" at

WP:RSP. Sjakkalle (Check!) 18:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Façade (film)

Façade (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NFSOURCES; Rotten Tomatoes is not a reputable source. The Film Creator (talk) 22:10, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep/Weak delete. I did find two independent reviews which are only partially viewable in google books (can't see film title but the cast list is identical and its in the right alphabetical spot and the reviews make sense in context to the film): [1] and [2]. This ref has an entry on the film. It's a borderline call.4meter4 (talk) 02:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:25, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete- I am not sure we should be the keeper of all things. I cannot find anything to say this was notable as a film or art. Lightburst (talk) 03:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 08:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.