Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fagelia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 19:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Fagelia
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fagelia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only Wikispecies information. Too short. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Being too short is not a reason for deletion. I have added a reference to the article which shows the genus exists. It may be endemic to Madagascar as I found these two other sources which are both related to Madagascar [1] and [2]. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ping me) 02:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ping me) 02:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ping me) 02:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ping me) 02:09, 31 January 2020 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ping me) 02:09, 31 January 2020 (UTC)]
- Merge to Osoriinae. Being too short is absolutely a reason to merge though. Mere existence of a species or genus does not mean we need an article, this is exactly what Wikipecies is for: https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fagelia Reywas92Talk 02:20, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.