Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahim Rahim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ and draftify to Draft:Fahim Rahim per consensus agreement between participants and nominator. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 02:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fahim Rahim

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

resume) of an unnotable kidney doctor and small scale philanthropist. Article itself was written by one User:Khocon, a sockpuppeteer. We also have an article for Fahim's brother which might also be worthy of deletion. -Samoht27 (talk) 16:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Medicine, Pakistan, and Idaho. -Samoht27 (talk) 16:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This BLP appears to be highly PROMO, written by a blocked sockpuppet, and reads more like a resume to promote themselves and their business. While the subject has won some awards, it's unclear if any of them are notable. According to ANYBIO, we may have to keep the BLP if any of the awards are significant. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Saqib: Can we draftify the article for now? Once the promotional content is removed, it can be published again. Additionally, there is not participation to prove these awards are notable. GrabUp - Talk 15:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:DONTDRAFTIFY. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Maybe If we build consensus then the article will be Draftify. GrabUp - Talk 15:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Grabup, You've my vote! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify: As said before “ Once the promotional content is removed, it can be published via AfC review again. Additionally, there is not participation to prove these awards are notable.” GrabUp - Talk 15:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Samoht27: Are you willing to withdraw this nomination ? —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Yes. Drafification seems optimal. -Samoht27 (talk) 16:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Samoht27, Thank you. Grabup, You'll have to ensure that the review cannot pass unless WP:GNG are met. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  😗 I never said that I am the person who will take all the responsibilities to publish this. Someone will do it in future maybe. GrabUp - Talk 16:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.