Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous Dex
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:20, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Famous Dex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks
]- Keep – I find this article to be simply alright and almost cited with references. It still needs more improvement. DBrown SPS (talk) 04:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – Agreeing with above. Xboxmanwar (talk) 19:57, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk • mail) 05:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk • mail) 05:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk • mail) 05:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk • mail) 05:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk • mail) 05:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)]
- Delete - Fails WP:ANYBIO. Trivial coverage in a few secondary sources. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This Biography of a living person is referenced primarily to Discogs, which is a crowdsourced website and therefore not a reliable source. None of the rest of the sources are reliable except possibly MTV and that is one brief, highly promotional paragraph. The person is not notable unless he has received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:38, 31 August 2016 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 01:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 01:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.