Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatih Mehmet Gul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per discussion at

WP:DRV (here), the original close was overturned to delete. As noted by some editors, the AfD had already been relisted twice, and the keep !votes where either by sockpuppets or were rebutted by those chossing to delete, which had stronger arguments. The fact we are dealing with a BLP pushed some editors towards the more conservative route of deletion. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 00:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Fatih Mehmet Gul

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage from independent reliable sources found. Fails

WP:BIO. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 07:36, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Medicine, and United Arab Emirates. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 07:36, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of RIS. Mccapra (talk) 07:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The majority of the references are from dependable sources, hence they satisfy
WP:ANYBIO. Sooterout (talk) 04:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
@
WP:ANYBIO? I don't see how the fact that majority of sources are dependable make him satisfy any of the three criteria for ANYBIO. Even if they are reliable, I am uncertain if all are independent, and they don't have significant coverage on the person. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 08:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak Keep~~Delete Most of the coverage is actually coverage of the hospital he runs. ~~But he made a Forbes list of 50 leaders transforming healthcare.~~ BruceThomson (talk) 08:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@BruceThomson: that forbes list is from forbesmiddleeast.com, and not Forbes itself. Anyone can nominate themselves on Forbes Middle East,[1] so this is different to Forbes. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 08:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. BruceThomson (talk) 09:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I would have vote for delete but While making futher research I found this [2] BruceThomson Is not anybody that apply that actually get selected on Forbes middle east kindly see [3][4] According to Forbes, the CEOs were ranked based on five criteria, including impact on the region, experience, size of company, achievements and innovations.And Forbes middle east is not fake but a local edition of regions see Forbes it listed among the 45 local edition.Princek2019 (talk) 08:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that
WP:ANYBIO. And there doesn't seem to be enough coverage of the subject to support general notability. BruceThomson (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google hit shows multiple reliable source from different independent reliable sources which clearly illustrates that the article has pass
WP:ANYBIO. Puvasoca (talk
) 6:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
@
WP:ANYBIO.. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 05:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.