Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatmir Terziu
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep or possibly no consensus, which would default to keep in any case. Luna Santin 02:16, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fatmir Terziu
Notability appears to be suspect. At the moment, my gut feeling is weak keep, but wanted to submit it for discussion. --Nlu (talk) 17:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - I have to agree with the requestor about the weak keep. I think that notability is a close one. Article does list some sources but 1 seems legic (from an BBC) article. Its close. Chris Kreider 17:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - I agree with Chris. If the BBC gets in the mix, I'm inclined to think our humble little encyclopedia should give him a chance. -bobby 17:42, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One documentary does not constitute multiple mainstream reliable and verifiable sources. The two websites did not do much to establish notability. This is not up to the the standard of many recently deleted bio articles.Edison 18:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, legit journalist, more notable than Kappa 04:43, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep I also suspect we might have more sources if there weren't a possible language barrier issue. JoshuaZ 23:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.