Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fattie Bum-Bum
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to ]
Fattie Bum-Bum
Too small, and never looks like it will be a decent article. One Of Seven Billion (talk) 06:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (barney) @ 08:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the artist, Carl Malcolm, since that article already has more information about the single than this one. Google Books shows that there's a little bit more information out there but it doesn't look like the article will ever be more than a paragraph. Since the artist in question only had three or four hits, there's no real need for an article for each. Dricherby (talk) 09:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep By coincidence I was looking at Fat Bottomed Girls just yesterday. Small is beautiful, IMO, though. There's more to say about the topic and that includes details of cover versions which would not sit well in the article about a particular artist. Warden (talk) 12:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per WP:NSONGS which clearly states, Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album. --Richhoncho (talk) 16:38, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]
- Redirect to Carl Malcolm, as per above. Bondegezou (talk) 12:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - per above; redirect is essentially the same thing as well. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.