Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Favored Nations (nonprofit)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Favored Nations (nonprofit)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Favored Nations (nonprofit) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks in-depth coverage; fails
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and California. Shellwood (talk) 07:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Strong keep There is plenty of in-depth coverage in the New York Times, Fast Company, ABC News, The Hollywood Reporter and many more in the referencea. The organization clearly meets WP:GNG criteria. I wonder, if the user Jsfodness even bothered reading those articles or just nominated based on any other ideas.--Rothwarms7 (talk) 21:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)]
- Keep. Coverage in mainstream media shows notability of the organization. KhinMoTi (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 12:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.