Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feedbackly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected csp |username}}.

Feedbackly

Feedbackly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suggest deletion as promotional as it reads as little more than a business directory listing, without indicating how the

Note: This debate has been included in the

Lepricavark (talk) 17:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Lepricavark (talk) 17:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Lepricavark (talk) 17:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete Good riddance, delete the garbage and the sockfarm that came along with it. All coverage appears to be press releases or minor mentions, nothing of substance that would warrant an article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As above. Just commercial blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete Fails
  -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note the company admits in an ad posted on Upwork that they created the article and are currently trying to hire someone to save it from deletion. SmartSE (talk) 12:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I concur with 331dot, this needs to go, and the Upwork ad is unfortunate. Wikipedia is not a marketing venue, and if anyone from Feedbackly is reading this, please understand that you should wait until your company legitimately meets our inclusion criteria. Thank you.
  talk) 19:56, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: Obvious attempt to use Wikipedia for free advertising is obvious. --Guy Macon (talk) 08:03, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Generic SAAS CRM company advertising their good on WP. scope_creep (talk) 00:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.