Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feliciano Canaveris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No arguments were made to assert or establish the subject's notability. ✗plicit 11:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feliciano Canaveris

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NOTGENEALOGY). Pilaz (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 07:18, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Editors should be made aware that a
WP:G5 would apply here because some non-minor edits were made to the page by other editors. Pilaz (talk) 22:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Articles can't be tainted by sockpuppets, only discussions (AFD, DYK, RFA, GAR etc) can. Now, block evasion is another thing. Geschichte (talk) 09:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- Taking the article at face value, he was merely an officer in certain armies, probably not with a high enough rank to be notable without more. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.