Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fichet-Bauche
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (
]Fichet-Bauche
- Fichet-Bauche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems like an advertisement article, not enough RS. Tyros1972 Talk 07:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 07:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - the article wasn't great but it was an accurate history of a major and highly notable company. I've added some better sources and some quotes about Fichet-Bauche. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:28, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep after Chiswick Chap's work. Bondegezou (talk) 09:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]
- Keep - per others. USM the Weather Whiz (Shoot me a line) 05:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.