Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fifty Foot Cliff

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fifty Foot Cliff

Fifty Foot Cliff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe this article meets the notability guidelines for geographical features. The references don't suggest the cliff is notable outside of Mansfield, Connecticut. It's just a cliff. CatcherStorm talk 14:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Sir Joseph (talk) 15:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom unless unless material could be found to argue for a merge to Fifty Foot Cliff Preserve. Yvarta (talk) 19:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep/Move to Fifty Foot Cliff Preserve. There are sources such as [1], [2], [3], plus several primary sources (Town of Mansfield) and lots of hits on hiking blogs.MB 03:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep already with so many references it is notable. It does not matter who knew about it before. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Existence of sources demonstrate the notability of this geographical feature. --Oakshade (talk) 04:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.