Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Intervention Team
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on
"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 00:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
]
First Intervention Team
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- First Intervention Team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass
WP:GNG, they exist, surely, but not notable. Was draftified with the hope that the article would be improved, but only a single, primary source was added. Onel5969 TT me 14:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete: Fail GNG Sonofstar (talk) 18:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.