Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Muslim Dynasty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 19:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First Muslim Dynasty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This isn't an actual term that anyone uses in this context. Brustopher (talk) 16:15, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is there a term which would be used for these people? I see there is an article concerning Muhammed's antecedents. Would renaming be an option?Pincrete (talk) 00:32, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, but I'm by no means an expert on Islamic family trees. It looks to me like the people in question have been chosen completely arbitrarily. I can't see why these three specific family trees have been chosen. For this reason I don't think renaming would solve anything. Brustopher (talk) 13:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rename -- Perhaps
Mohammed fitted into it. Not being a Muslim, I am not familiar with his patronymic or tribal name. Nevertheless, the number of people listed with blue-links, clearly points to keeping it in some form. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:18, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

@Peterkingiron: That article already exists at Family tree of Muhammad, this seems to just be an odd page, arbitrarily filled with random groups of Muhammad's relatives. Brustopher (talk) 19:15, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it's an
WP:INDISCRIMINATE array of random entries, and does not actually say something about "First Muslim Dynasty" Kraxler (talk) 19:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.