Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flop!
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Flop_(disambiguation). Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Flop!
- Flop! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no idividual notability shown for this album. lacks charting, awards, covers, coverage. nothing satisfying
]- Keep Unless this article is unreferenced it should be kept. Unlike its policy on songs, which requires notability, wikipedi'a policy on albums allows most albums to have an article. Generally a single will have its own page, but other tracks will not. This is why the eventual complete coverage of albums is prudent. When you search for one of the lesser tracks on the album, you will be redirected to the album page. It is important that wikipedia improves its coverage of such articles related to albums, as wikipedia is often the fist resource that people turn to when trying to identify music. Wikipedia already has an excellent reputation for being a great page to find informationa bout music and it would not e wise to spoil such a reputation. Therefore i think this arguament should change from being one about the significance of the album (as this is insignificant in itself) and rather that we should focus on whether the article is of the necessary quality and has sufficent referencing to justify keeping it. talk, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Redirect to the band. Not notable. talk's argument is invalid. Pburka (talk) 17:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:52, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment shouldn't this be redirected to the disambiguation page, if it is turned into a redirect? 65.93.12.101 (talk) 23:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
- Redirect to the band. I can find evidence the album exists[1], but no reliable source coverage. 28bytes (talk) 05:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Flop_(disambiguation) which seems to already have a link that redirects to the band in question. Wickedjacob (talk) 04:32, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.