Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluffy (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn, so to speak, AND consensus to delete, AND a proposition to userfy and improve. I will "KEEP" this pro forma, then userfy to Michig without leaving a redirect. Complaints can be filed with Sue, in triplicate, and in at least six languages with clicks. Drmies (talk) 19:50, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fluffy (song)

Fluffy (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No credible assertion of

• Hmm yes. Delete. There's one brief post in an NME blog, but that's not enough to pass the barrier of
  WP:GNG. Drmies (talk) 20:44, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment Now that
  WP:CSD#A9. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:50, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• there is not sufficient third party coverage of the song to merit a stand alone article; if the band were notable, the NME blog info could be merged there quite comfortably, but since there are no appropriate targets for a merge or redirect, delete. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:54, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, not notable. Frietjes (talk) 21:48, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I tagged it with A9 but it was declined. Other than the A9 criteria, fails
  WP:NSONGS. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:35, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore the Wolf Alice article and merge it there. There's enough coverage of the band for an article, including a few reviews of this single: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. --Michig (talk) 07:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Michig, if you like I'll be happy to userfy it to you so you can clean it up and put it back. The original editor does not, I'm afraid, appear qualified to do so. Just drop me a line on my talk page if you'd like me to do that. Thanks for your continued efforts to save and produce content. Drmies (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, if you wouldn't mind doing that, I'll work on it over the weekend. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Well, that was fun: I closed an AfD as keep, then deleted the article. A deletionist admin's wet dream! Drmies (talk) 19:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.