Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly Hornbill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 11:11, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fly Hornbill

Fly Hornbill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 15:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete no indication of notability because there is virtually no coverage in independent reliable sources. There is only one acceptable independent source that covers this: [1]. But this is not enough to demonstrate notability. Agree with nom fails GNG and NCORP. This is probably
  wp:too soon, having only been established in 2016 as a small airline (read source). Steve Quinn (talk) 06:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - a news search brought up nothing. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.