Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For All We Know (band)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:21, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- For All We Know (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This bands notability appears to be based on having notable musicians but all the blue linked members only claim to notability is being in two notable bands, one of which is For All We Know. Without For All We Know they are not notable making the band not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Nothing else satisfying
]Keep ʎɐʍɥbıɥɹɯ (ʇ/ɔ/6) 01:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails
WP:MUSIC, second-level notability at best. Insufficient reliable sources. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:55, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Author Keep, the band is essentially a side-project of Sleeping with Sirens, and think of
]- I'll whip out that other stuff exists. And I don't consider The Color of Violence notable. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
- Delete Bands with individually notable members need something more than just "notable members" to pass WP:GNG. They've done nothing of note. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:36, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't appear to be much in terms of coverage. Simply having marginally notable members is not enough. None of their releases seem to have any sort of notability. First source duplicates their MySpace profile. The second is a video. Christopher Connor (talk) 20:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.