Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forever Red (movie)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
type 10:08, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Forever Red (movie)
Article about a nonexistent
at 21:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete, but I'm sure that there's got to be a CSD for this article, if not ]
- Comment This is not actually a hoax, so much as it is miswritten. There is an episode of the Power Rangers called Forever Red which actually already has an article. A much better written one. So, either delete, or redirect. FrozenPurpleCube 21:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article implies that it is a direct-to-video/theatrical release, not the episode that already has a page. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That would be why I said it's miswritten. I'm being charitable and assuming that it is not deliberate, but merely confusion. FrozenPurpleCube 21:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The author originally linked this page to the page of the episode. I know it's ABF, but based on his history of edits, I'm saying it's deliberate. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, whether it is or isn't, that's not something to be handled here. Still, you might get a CSD by noting that this is a duplicate of another article. FrozenPurpleCube 02:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If it were a duplicate (which it isn't, if you compare it to at 04:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I say it's a mix of duplication and inaccuracy, and am reserving judgement on whether or not it is a deliberate hoax, but whatever, the real point was you really should have mentioned that original Power Rangers episode in your nomination. It would have added some useful clarity. FrozenPurpleCube 14:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If it were a duplicate (which it isn't, if you compare it to
- Well, whether it is or isn't, that's not something to be handled here. Still, you might get a CSD by noting that this is a duplicate of another article. FrozenPurpleCube 02:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The author originally linked this page to the page of the episode. I know it's
- That would be why I said it's miswritten. I'm being charitable and assuming that it is not deliberate, but merely confusion. FrozenPurpleCube 21:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article implies that it is a direct-to-video/theatrical release, not the episode that already has a page. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No IMDB listing for movie. No other reference. Not notable even if not a hoax. The episode "Power Rangers Wild Force: Forever Red (#1.34)" does not seem to be relevant to this discussion. Bejnar 05:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The episode from which this article seems to be borrowing its content is not relevant? Coulda fooled me. FrozenPurpleCube 14:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I know that you're trying to Power Rangers episode of the same name" is an obvious and deliberate attempt to introduce false information.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:25, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I agree it is misleading information, but without mindreading, I can't say it's deliberate. It probably is, but AfD isn't the place to deal with it anyway. WP:RFI would be a better choice. FrozenPurpleCube 01:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I agree it is misleading information, but without mindreading, I can't say it's deliberate. It probably is, but AfD isn't the place to deal with it anyway.
- I know that you're trying to
- The episode from which this article seems to be borrowing its content is not relevant? Coulda fooled me. FrozenPurpleCube 14:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.