Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Form 15CB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:42, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Form 15CB

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is more or less how to information. It is specific to Indian tax law, and would be better in an article on that subject. I may be mistaken, but I do not see how specific tax form merit their own article. Skrelk (talk) 09:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia is not an Indian tax guide. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Taxation in India. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) (formerly R——bo) 04:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

t • c) 09:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete as a
WP:GNG. Basically it's a tax form which covers Section 195 of the Indian Income Tax Act. A brief mention here would suffice. Funny ^Pika 13:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment I was going through

ITR 3, SUGAM ITR-4S). Depending on the outcome of this AfD, I would suggest the same for these. Funny ^Pika 14:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment A discussion about one of these forms followed on its
Talk:Form 2E. AllyD (talk) 23:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete this page and all other such pages except where a firm reference can be found that establishes the form as notable (and not just a how-to-fill-it-in guide, of relevance only to accountants on the one side and bureaucrats on the other). AllyD (talk) 23:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails
Talkback) 00:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.