Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fotolia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Fotolia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced, a

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails
  WP:PROMO. Per nom, poorly sourced.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete Fails the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and
  -- HighKing⁺⁺ 18:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to
  Adobe Systems as the parent company. Logical search term and alternative to deletion. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Comment as nom, I'm also good with this option for stated reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewmutt (talk • contribs) 02:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per TonyBallioni as this is a plausible search term. -- Dane ^talk 20:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to
  WP:ATD-R. Source searches are not demonstrating notability to qualify a standalone article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:18, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.