Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foyr.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Foyr.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, founded in 2014. Cannot see how it can pass the revised

WP:NCORP. Promotional article. Edwardx (talk) 22:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk|c|em) 05:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk|c|em) 05:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk|c|em) 05:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:34, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notability estabkished by very substantial coverage in reliavle independent sources such as those cited already. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:08, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - online references are trivial and seem to be mostly recycled press released. I note that the article was already deleted once. Shritwod (talk) 23:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is a dearth of good quality independent sources. For a firm existing since 2014, I would expect much more coverage of a notable service or product. I am finding a lot of press releases and announcements of funding. I agree with the previous comment that some media seems to be reprinting or creating feeds based on these; such articles cannot be considered independent articles written by journalists. --DreamLinker (talk) 05:48, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.