Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freight Tycoon Inc.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Freight Tycoon Inc.
- Freight Tycoon Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article contains very little information about an unnotable game.
Sign!) 12:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the Sign!) 14:12, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Since it appears to have another developer than the other games, I can't be sure, but it seems to be a game in a notable series: Zoo Tycoon, Mall Tycoon, RollerCoaster Tycoon, Transport Tycoon, etc. The article is short. But it would make a viable stub. [1] - Mgm|(talk) 16:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not sure it is part of a series since only Transport and RollerCoaster Tycoon have the same developer and looking at the other article is appears that Zoo and Mall Tycoon are seperate series and both have different developers. Also since Fright Tycoon has a different developer than either of the series listed it strongly implies that it is not part of either series. The only real connection I see is that they all end in tycoon. --70.24.176.152 (talk) 21:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no sources out there except press releases and unreliable blogs and such. Without reliable and independent secondary sources, it fails WP:N. It looks like it's taken on the Tycoon name as a clone, rather than being part of an official series. Randomran (talk) 01:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — I could also not find any significant coverage through reliable sources to establish ]
- Delete. Unnotable, per 03:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.