Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freya Mathews

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) LibStar (talk) 05:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Freya Mathews

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not convinced she meets WP:PROF nor WP:AUTHOR. she's written a few things but no high level awards nor peer recognition LibStar (talk) 04:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:42, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:42, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Author of multiple published works that are most certainly notable themselves. Also see: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL). Notably The Ecological Self went through multiple re-publications and received positive reception from numerous different sorts of academic reviews. — Cirt (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has a GS h-index of 14, which is pretty good for philosophy, even though the work is in a popular area. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - Literary work is sufficient for
WP:PROF. Aeonx (talk) 07:12, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.